host Mike Rowe is known for his measured, devastating take-downs of
people who attack him or his work. He has perfected the art of subtly
twisting the knife in the side of critics with calm, cool language.
skill was on display Thursday when Rowe responded to a woman criticized
his politics on Facebook.
narrates the show “How The Universe Works” on the Science Channel. The
woman, Rebecca Bright, called Rowe an “anti-education, science doubting,
ultra-right wing conservative” who should be fired.
love the show How the Universe Works, but I’m lost on how the producers
and the Science Channel can allow anti-education, science doubting,
ultra-right wing conservative Mike Rowe to narrate the show,” Bright
to Rowe. “There are countless scientists that should be hired for
that, or actors, if you must, that believe in education and science that
would sound great narrating the show, example: Morgan Freeman. Cancel
this fools contract and get any of your scientists so often on the show
to narrate it.”
his response, Rowe started off by exhibiting his knowledge of the
subject of the show and killing Rebecca with kindness:
hi there, Rebecca. How’s it going?
of all, I’m glad you like the show. “How the Universe Works” is a
terrific documentary series that I’ve had the pleasure of narrating
for the last six seasons. I thought this week’s premiere was
especially good. It was called, “Are Black Holes Real?” If you didn’t
see it, spoiler alert….no one knows!!!
true. The existence of Black Holes has never been proven. Some
cosmologists are now convinced they don’t exist at all, and the race
to prove their actuality has become pretty intense. Why? Because so
much of what we think we know about the cosmos depends upon them. In
other words, the most popular explanations as to how the universe
actually works, are based upon the existence of a thing that no one
has been able to prove.
I’m sure you know, it’s OK to make assumptions based on theories. In
fact, it’s critical to progress. But it’s easy these days to confuse
theory with fact. Thanks to countless movies and television shows that
feature Black Holes as a plot device, and many documentaries that
bring them to life with gorgeous CGI effects and dramatic music, a lot
of people are under the assumption that Black Holes are every bit as
real as the Sun and the Moon. Well, maybe they are, and maybe they
aren’t. We just don’t know. That’s why I enjoyed this week’s show so
much. It acknowledged the reasons we should question the existence of
something that many assume to be “settled science.” It invited us to
on programs like these, I’m asked to re-record a passage that’s
suddenly rendered inaccurate by the advent of new information.
Sometimes, over the course of just a few days. That’s how fast the
information changes. Last year for instance, on an episode called
“Galaxies,” the original script – carefully vetted by the best minds
in physics – claimed there were approximately one hundred billion
galaxies in the known universe. A hundred billion! (Not a typo.) I
couldn’t believe it when I read it. I mean, the Milky Way alone has
something like 400 billion stars! Andromeda has a trillion! How many
stars must there be in a universe, with a hundred billion galaxies?
a few weeks later, the best minds in physics came together again, and
determined that the total number of galaxies in the universe was NOT
in fact, a hundred billion. They were off. Not by a few thousand, or a
few million, or few billion, or even a few hundred billion. The were
off by two trillion. That’s right…TWO TRILLION!! But here’s the point,
Rebecca – when I narrate this program, it doesn’t matter if I’m
correct or incorrect – I always sound the same. And guess what? So do
then slowly turned his keyboard to Rebecca’s idea that he should be
fired because doesn’t “believe in education and science,” and it gets
I wrote about this discrepancy, people became upset. They thought I
was making fun of science. They thought I was suggesting that because
physicists were off by one trillion, nine hundred billion galaxies,
all science was suddenly suspect, and no claims could be trusted. In
general, people like you accused me of “doubting science.” Which is a
curious accusation, since science without doubt isn’t science at all.
is an important point. If I said I was skeptical that a supernatural
being put us here on Earth, you’d be justified in calling me a
“doubter of religion.” But if I said I was skeptical that manmade
global warming was going to melt the icecaps, that doesn’t make me a
“doubter of science.” Once upon a time, the best minds in science told
us the Sun revolved around the Earth. They also told us the Earth was
flat, and that a really bad fever could be cured by blood-letting.
Happily, those beliefs were questioned by skeptical minds, and we
moved forward. Science is a wonderful thing, and a critical thing. But
without doubt, science doesn’t advance. Without skepticism, we have no
reason to challenge the status quo. Anyway, enough pontificating.
Let’s consider for a moment, your very best efforts to have me fired.
called me an “ultra-right wing conservative,” who is both
“anti-education,” and “science-doubting.” Interestingly, you offer no
proof. Odd, for a lover of science. So I challenge you to do so now.
Please provide some evidence that I am in fact the person you’ve
described. And by evidence, I don’t mean a sentence taken out of
context, or a meme that appeared in your newsfeed, or a photo of me
standing next to a politician or a talk-show host you don’t like. I
mean actual proof of what you claim I am.
please bear in mind that questioning the cost of a college degree does
not make me “anti-education.” Questioning the existence of dark-matter
does not make me a “dark-matter denier.” And questioning the wisdom of
a universal $15 minimum wage doesn’t make me an “ultra-right wing
conservative.” As for Morgan Freeman, I agree. He’s a terrific
narrator, and a worthy replacement. But remember, Morgan played God on
the big screen. Twice. Moreover, he has publicly claimed to be a
“believer.” (gasp!) Should this disqualify him from narrating a series
that contradicts the Bible at every turn? If not, why not?
Rebecca, my beef with your post comes down to this – if you go to my
boss and ask her to fire me because you can’t stand the sound of my
voice, I get it. Narrators with unpleasant voices should probably look
for other work anyway, and if enough people share your view, no hard
feelings – I’ll make room for Morgan. But if you’re trying to get me
fired simply because you don’t like my worldview, well then, I’m going
to fight back. Partly because I like my job, and partly because you’re
wrong about your assumptions, but mostly because your tactics typify a
toxic blend of laziness and group-think that are all too common today
– a hot mess of hashtags and intolerance that deepen the chasm
currently dividing our country.
your own post, and think about your actual position. You’ve publicly
asked a network to fire the narrator of a hit show because you might
not share his personal beliefs. Don’t you think that’s kind
of…extraordinary? Not only are you unwilling to engage with someone
you disagree with – you can’t even enjoy a show you claim to love if
you suspect the narrator might not share your view of the world! Do
you know how insular that makes you sound? How fragile?
just visited your page, and read your own description of you. It was
revealing. It says, “I stand my ground. I fear no one & nothing. I
have & will fight for what’s right.”
I’m missing something, but I don’t think the ground you’re standing on
is worth defending. If you truly fear “no one & nothing,” it’s not
because you’re brave; it’s because you’re unwilling to expose yourself
to ideas that frighten you. And while I can see that you like to fight
for what you think is “right” (in this case, getting people fired that
you disagree with,) one could easily say the same thing about any
other misguided, garden-variety bully.
other words, Rebecca, I don’t think you give a damn about science. If
I’m wrong, prove it. Take a step back and be skeptical about your own
assumptions. Take a moment to doubt your own words, and ask yourself –
as any good scientist would – if you’ve got your head up a black hole.
said all that, I think you’re gonna love next week’s episode. It’s
called Multiple Stars! Check it out, Tuesdays at 10pm, on Science.